This comes at a most opportune time. I would love for them to try out their software here and see how people, former audiences, can begin to make deep impacts on television's program content. Though only 30% of Pinoys are wired, I am confident that this number will double in a year's time and we will nearly have reached critical mass.
For the most part, television stations need to take social tv seriously, and not, as described in the article, feature social connectivity as a "bolted on" component. There is a purpose for connecting to one's audiences, and it is not simply to brag about numbers. I think most producers think that, if they connect to Facebook and their show is popular, they should get an approximate number of "likes" and posts as well. Clearly, it's a different situation. They cannot expect all their viewers to be posting opinions on FB. For one, not everyone is connected. Second, even if they are connected, they may not have the technological literacy to navigate a social app. Third, they may not have the literacy to comment, period. Fourth, they really don't give shit.
They will not get the numbers, but they will get opinions, reactions, suggestions, and these, in my opinion, are far more richer nuggets of data than hard numbers will ever provide. Based on their reactions, it will be possible to see what it is they connect to in terms of content. Viewers, especially the last three generations of media consumers who were born into a mediated society, know when they are being played with. Well, that's what I want to believe. It's not enough anymore that tv producers sit around and try to make money by churning out template stories and spectacles, thinking it's "what viewers want."
Newsflash: viewers want to be taken seriously. That's why they go online and talk, rant, praise, recommend. So tv networks better listen, and take the emerging social tv phenomenon seriously. That, or risk losing more audiences to torrent sites and cable.